For regulated life sciences

Work you can stand behind.

An expert agent workforce for life sciences: the teams inside pharma, the consultancies that serve them, and the digital health companies answering to both. Every answer arrives with its sources. Every deliverable arrives signed, with the record of who decided behind it.

Covering market access · medical affairs · regulatory · evidence.

Product reimbursement dossierGermanyIn reviewGate closed
01 · The draft
The work itself

At the depth you asked for, with nothing hidden behind it.

02 · The evidence trail
What supports each claim

Every source attached, every gap marked instead of filled.

Confidence
03 · The review record
Who decided, and on what

Disagreement gets its own required entry. A named person signs before the work moves on.

Signed · [reviewer name]Dissent on file · 2

The record is these three together: the work, what supports it, and who cleared it.

The front door

You don't have to know what you need.

Every request starts with your Chief of Staff. It reads your request, decides which of the five kinds of work it needs, and tells you which one before any work starts.

I never pretend to be the expert. I know who is.

Reads every request · passes it on · keeps the record

RegulatoryIs an FDA 505(b)(2) plausible for this 505(b)(1) asset?
An answer
ReimbursementWhat did the G-BA actually compare this orphan drug against?
A consultation
Cross-functionShould we pursue accelerated approval? Regulatory, access and medical disagree.
A panel
Produce workDraft the AMNOG Module 3 additional-benefit section.
A deliverable
Out of coverageWhat is a fair day rate for a freelance MSL in Portugal?
Not ours to answer
Whole outcomeRun our German reimbursement submission, with HEOR and regulatory leads in the gates.
A Mission

It never bills you twice for the same question.

The work

Five things you can ask for.

Each request gets only as much work as it needs. You pay for the work done, not for how big the question sounded.

01

An answer

You, alone

A cited answer in the document you are already writing, with every gap marked.

02

A consultation

You and one expert agent

The reasoning kept, with the sources it rests on.

03

A panel

You and three to five expert agents

A deliberation, with each disagreement recorded on its own line.

Above, the work is yours aloneBelow, your team is in it
04

A deliverable

You, end to end

The draft, its evidence trail, and your signature at the gate.

05

A Mission

You and your team

Many deliverables, each gated and signed, under one record.

A panel is several agents and one signature. A Mission is several people, and a gate is where the work stops until one of them signs.

Why this shape

Three failures. Every organization has all of them.

All three have one root: treating AI as a tool rather than as a workforce.

You can't defend it

“The AI said so” is not a defense.

Regulators, quality reviewers and courts do not take an algorithm's word for it. When your name goes on the work, the record goes with it.

You can't work as one

Humans in meetings. AI in chat windows.

A tool can join a workflow. Only a workforce can share the work, on the same page, with the same history.

You can't keep it

Everything you learn walks out the door.

Every program relearns what the last one knew. The reasoning leaves with the people and you pay for the rediscovery twice.

What makes it defensible

The record, not the draft, is the product.

Before you sign something, you need three things in front of you. Most tools give you the first. A few are starting to give you the second.

Shipping everywhere

The draft

Every drafting tool already sells this. It is the work, and nothing about who will stand behind it.

Emerging

The evidence trail

A few tools are starting to bind claims to sources. That is necessary. It is not the signature.

The one that is missing

The review record

Nothing produces this. Disagreement, the person who signed, and the moment the work was allowed to move.

The record is yours. If you ever leave VITAL, it leaves with you.

How we hold ourselves

The status is stated, never rounded up.

The company that sells you the honest record owes you one about itself.

Status boardStated as is
The platformShipping to the founding cohort
In active build
The record architectureEvidence trail and review record
Designed, partially built
Measurement against real signaturesRegistered in advance. Not yet run.
Pre-registered
Who it's for

Three markets. The same five.

Whoever you are, you can ask for all five. What changes is who signs the work, and who reads it after.

Life sciences teams
Commission the outcome through the services budget, and keep the record.
Your reviewer signs · your quality unit inspects it
Consultancies
Take on the work you currently turn down, under your own brand.
Your partner signs · your client's QA reads it
Digital health and biotech
The function you cannot hire yet, running today.
You sign · an investor or an authority reads it

Also for the individual whose name goes on the work, and for the expert who wants their method to run when they are not in the room.

What it costs

Less than one hour of expert time a month.

One expert consultation hour
≈ $200
VITAL Pro, a full month
$199

Skip one agency deliverable and you have paid for the year. See pricing →

Before you join

We are not for you if —

you need a validated GxP system
you need submission-ready regulatory output today
you want an AI that decides rather than one that drafts and evidences
you have no named human willing to sign the work

If any of those describe you, do not subscribe. We would rather tell you now than at your quality review.

Founding cohort · now open

Put your name on work you can defend.